Path loss modeling for vehicular system performance and communicaitons protocols evaluation

Vehicular communications are receiving considerable attention due to the introduction of the intelligent transportation system (ITS) concept, enabling smart and intelligent driving technologies and applications. To design, evaluate and optimize ITS applications and services oriented to improve vehicular safety, but also non-safety applications based on wireless systems, the knowledge of the propagation channel is vital. In particular, the mean path loss is one of the most important parameters used in the link budget, being a measure of the channel quality and limiting the maximum allowed distance between the transmitter (Tx) and the receiver (Rx). From a narrowband vehicular-to-vehicular (V2V) channel measurement campaign carried out at 5.9 GHz in three different urban environments characterized by high traffic density, this paper analyzes the path loss in terms of the Tx-Rx separation distance and fading statistics. Based on a linear slope model, values for the path loss exponent and the standard deviation of shadowing are reported. We have evaluated the packet error rate (PER) and the maximum achievable Tx-Rx separation distance for a PER threshold level of 10% according to the digital short-range communications (DSRC) specifications. The results reported here can be incorporated in an easy way to vehicular networks (VANETs) simulators in order to develop, evaluate and validate new protocols and systems architecture configurations under realistic propagation conditions.Fernández González, HA.; Rubio Arjona, L.; Reig, J.; Rodrigo Peñarrocha, VM.; Valero-Nogueira, A. (2013). Path loss modeling for vehicular system performance and communicaitons protocols evaluation. Mobile Networks and Applications. 18(6):755-765. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0463-xS755765186Gallager B, Akatsuka H, Suzuki H (2006) Wireless communications for vehicle safety: radio link performance and wireless connectivity. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 1(4):4–24Rubio L, Reig J, Fernández H (2011) Propagation aspects in vehicular networks, Vehicular technologies. Almeida M (ed) InTechWang C-X, Vasilakos A, Murch R, Shen SGX, Chen W, Kosch T (2011) Guest editorial. Vehicular communications and networks – part I. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 29(1):1–6ASTM E2213-03 (2003) Standard specification for telecommunications and information exchange between roadside and vehicle systems – 5 GHz band Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM), West ConshohockenIEEE 1609 – Family of Standards for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE). [Online]. Available: http://www.standards.its.dot.govETSI TR 102 492–2 Part 2 (2006) Technical characteristics for Pan European Harminized Communications Equipment Operating in the 5 GHz frequency range intended for road safety and traffic management, and for non-safety related ITS applications, European Telecommunications Standard Institute (ETSI), Technical Report, Sophia Antipolis, FranceThe Car-to-Car Communication Comsortium (C2CC): http:/www.car-to-car.orgMecklenbräuker C, Molisch A, Karedal J, Tufvesson F, Paier A, Bernado L, Zemen T, Klemp O, Czink N (2011) Vehicular channel characterization and its implications for wireless system design and performance. IEEE Proc 99(7):1189–1212Ghafoor KZ, Bakar KA, Lloret J, Khokhar RH, Lee KC (2013) Intelligent beaconless geographical routing for urban vehicular environments. Int J Wireless Netw 19(3):345–362Ghafoor KZ, Lloret J, Bakar KA, Sadiq AS, Mussa SAB (2013) Beaconing approaches in vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey. Int J Wirel Pers Commun. Published Online (May 2013)Michelson DG, Ghassemzadeh SS (2009) New directions in wireless communications, Springer Science+Busines Media (Chapter 1)IEEE 802.11p (2010) Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), New York, USA.Karedal J, Czink N, Paier A, Tufvesson F, Moisch AF (2011) Path loss modeling for vehicle-to-vehicle communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 60(1):323–327Cheng L, Henty B, Stancil D, Bai F, Mudalige P (2007) Mobile vehicle-to-vehicle narrow-band channel measurement and characterization of the 5.9 GHz dedicated short range communication (DSRC) frequency band. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 25(8):1501–1516Cheng L, Henty B, Cooper R, Stancil D, Bai F (2008) Multi-path propagation measurements for vehicular networks at 5.9 GHz. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 1239–1244Tan I, Tang W, Laberteaux K, Bahai N (2008) Measurement and analysis of wireless channel impairments in dsrc vehicular communications. IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 4882–4888.Campuzano AJ, Fernández H, Balaguer D, Vila-Jiménez A, Bernardo-Clemente B, Rodrigo-Peñarrocha VM, Reig J, Valero-Nogueira A, Rubio L (2012) Vehicular-to-vehicular channel characterization and measurement results. WAVES 4(1):14–24Kunisch J, Pamp J (2008) Wideband car-to-car radio channel measurements and model at 5.9 GHz. IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5Gozalvez J, Sepulcre M (2007) Opportunistic technique for efficient wireless vehicular communications. IEEE Veh Technol Mag 2(4):33–39Zang Y, Stibor L, Orfanos G, Guo S, Reumerman H (2005) An error model for inter-vehicle communications in highway scenarios at 5.9 GHz. Proc. Int. Workshop on performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks, pp. 49–5